Roland E. Schaefer appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his lawsuit as barred by sovereign immunity and an injunction issued in an earlier lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Schaefer’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Lupiani v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 435 F.3d 842, 845 (8th Cir. 2006) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Atkinson v. Bohn, 91 F.3d 1127, 1128-29 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal for failure to state claim). Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny Schaefer’s pending motions on appeal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.