Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Samuel Snowden v. Poulan/Weed Eater

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Samuel Snowden v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 214 F. App'x 624 (8th Cir. 2007)
Colloton, Hansen, Benton

Samuel Snowden v. Poulan/Weed Eater

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Snowden appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his employment-discrimination action. Having conducted de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Snowden untimely filed the prerequisite administrative charge of discrimination, and the circumstances he alleged did not warrant equitable tolling or estoppel. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, then United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, now United States Circuit Judge.

Reference

Full Case Name
Samuel SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. Poulan/Weed EATER, Appellee
Status
Unpublished
↑