United States v. Allende Delgado-Ruiz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Allende Delgado-Ruiz

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 05-3635 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Allende Delgado-Ruiz, also known as * Northern District of Iowa. Juan Ruiz, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: March 7, 2007 Filed: March 15, 2007 ___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Allende Delgado-Ruiz (Ruiz) appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon his guilty plea to illegally reentering the United States after having been removed subsequent to a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). The court sentenced Ruiz to 41 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release. Ruiz’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that enhancing Ruiz’s sentence based on prior convictions (for which he has already been punished) resulted in double punishment.

We reject this argument. See United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 12, 14 (8th Cir. 1991) (use of prior crimes to enhance sentence does not violate Double Jeopardy Clause). Further, having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished