Daniel R. Baird appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action for relocation benefits from his employer. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See K.C.1986 Ltd. P’ship v. Reade Mfg., 472 F.3d 1009, 1019-20 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Baird’s pending motions.