Percy Harrell pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). At sentencing, over Harrell’s objection, the district court 1 applied a two-level enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), and sentenced Harrell to 168 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. He appeals, contesting the two-level enhancement. Reviewing the *637 district court’s finding for clear error, see United States v. Braggs, 817 F.3d 901, 904 (8th Cir. 2003), we affirm.

The district court concluded that, because two handguns and $7,700 in admitted drug proceeds were found in Harrell’s house, it was not clearly improbable that there was a nexus between the guns and drug activities; the court also noted the presence of a small amount of crack cocaine in the house plus drug-packaging paraphernalia in the detached garage. The court did not clearly err in imposing the enhancement. See Brown v. United States, 169 F.3d 531, 533 (8th Cir. 1999) (“close proximity of firearms and ‘drug money’ can give rise to an inference that the firearms are present to protect the money and drugs, which is a nexus sufficient to support an enhancement under 2D1.1(b)(1)”); U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), comment. (n.3) (clearly improbable standard).

Accordingly, we affirm.