Carlson v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.
Opinion
Stephen Carlson appeals various rulings by the district court 1 culminating in the *634 dismissal with prejudice of his employment lawsuit. Following careful de novo review, we conclude that defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly granted, and that none of the district court’s other rulings were erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1
. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minne *634 sota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Stephen W. CARLSON, Appellant, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., Being Sued as American Express Financial Advisors; American Express, Parent Company; Kelly Services, Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished