[UNPUBLISHED]

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action, Arkansas inmate Reginald Dunahue appeals the district court’s 1 entry of judgment in accordance with the jury verdict in favor of defendants, arguing his trial attorney presented testimony and exhibits proving that defendants’ treatment of him violated prison policy and the Eighth Amendment. Dunahue did not, however, provide this court with a trial transcript or request one at government expense. We therefore are unable to review the sufficiency-of-the-evidence issue he raises. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(1) (discussing appellant’s duty to order transcript); Meroney v. Delta Int’l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir. 1994); Van Treese v. Blome, 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 385-86 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.