Paul Love appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his action based on the court’s determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the parties reached a settlement agreement at their August 23, 2005 meeting, and that the terms of the agreement are embodied in the transcript of the meeting. See Chaganti & Assocs., P.C. v. Nowotny, 470 F.3d 1215, 1221 (8th Cir. 2006) (appeals court reviews for clear error district court’s finding that settlement agreement existed), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2977, — L.Ed.2d - (2007) (No. 06-1377). In addition, we find nothing in the record to support Love’s unsubstantiated claim that he was coerced into the agreement.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.