Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court’s de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court. See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P., 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir. 2005) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee’s motion to reconsider. See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates, 92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.