James E. Thompson v. Tri-State Ins. of MN

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
James E. Thompson v. Tri-State Ins. of MN, 251 F. App'x 370 (8th Cir. 2007)

James E. Thompson v. Tri-State Ins. of MN

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James E. Thompson, Sr., appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that Thompson established neither diversity jurisdiction nor federal-question jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332(a)(1); 4:20 Communications, Inc. v. Paradigm Co., 336 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2003) (party invoking federal jurisdiction has burden to establish jurisdictional requirements). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Thompson’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Reference

Full Case Name
James E. THOMPSON, Sr., Appellant, v. TRI-STATE INSURANCE OF MINNESOTA; Dakota Redi-Mix; Berkley Administrators; Jerry Rachetto, Appellees
Status
Unpublished