Santos Fidel Portillo was found guilty by a jury of conspiring to distribute and distributing methamphetamine. After this court twice vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing, the district court 1 imposed a 188-month prison sentence. On his now third appeal, Portillo argues that the district court erred in denying him the opportunity to object to the obstruction-of-justice enhancement be *713 cause this court did not specifically resolve the issue in either of its remands.

We conclude that the district court properly refrained from considering the issue, as it could have been raised in Portillo’s first appeal. See United States v. Thompson, 335 F.3d 782, 784-85 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.