In this appeal after a remand, see Nunley v. Dep’t of Justice, 425 F.3d 1132 (8th Cir. 2005), James Nunley challenges the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action to set aside administrative forfeitures. Upon de novo review, see Bloom v. Metro Heart Group of St. Louis, Inc., 440 F.3d 1025, 1028 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.