Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Arthur McElroy v. Janssen Pharmaceutica

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Arthur McElroy v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, 282 F. App'x 510 (8th Cir. 2008)
Wollman, Riley, Gruender

Arthur McElroy v. Janssen Pharmaceutica

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arthur McElroy appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his pro se products-liability claims against Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. 2 Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir. 2007), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and appellees’ pending motion is denied.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

2

. McElroy's claim against Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical Company is not at issue in this appeal.

Reference

Full Case Name
Arthur MCELROY, Appellant, v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC.; Janssen Pharmaceutica, N v. Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical, Co., Appellees
Status
Unpublished
↑