[UNPUBLISHED]

David Carl Sagert appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude that Sagert’s sentence is not unreasonable, see United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review of revocation sentences), because it is within the statutory limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and it resulted from the district court’s consideration of appropriate factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), see United States v. Nelson, 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellate court reviews revocation sentence to determine whether it is unreasonable in relation to, inter alia, certain § 3553(a) factors).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.