[UNPUBLISHED]

Federal prisoner James VanDolah appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Following de novo review, see Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089,1091 (8th Cir. 2003), we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper, and we decline to consider VanDolah’s newly raised constitutional claims, see Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 545 v. Hope Elec. Corp., 380 F.3d 1084, 1096 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.