G.W. Delaney and Phyllis Delaney (the Delaneys) appeal following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment to the last remaining defendants in their civil-rights lawsuit. We reject as meritless the Delaneys’ various challenges to the district court’s well-reasoned determination that there were no trialworthy issues on the constitutional, conspiracy, and state-law claims against Detective Paul Norris, see Smith v. Insley’s Inc., 499 F.3d 875, 879 (8th Cir. 2007) (summary judgment standard of review); and the Delaneys have waived all other claims by not addressing them in their opening brief, see K.D. v. County of Crow Wing, 434 F.3d 1051, 1055 n. 4 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.