Zachary Hrasky pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He now appeals the district court’s 1 final judgment, asserting that he is seeking a final decision from this court so he can petition the Supreme Court for review of this court’s earlier interlocutory decision in United States v. Hrasky, 453 F.3d 1099 (8th Cir. 2006) (reversing suppression of evidence), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2098, 167 L.Ed.2d 812 (2007). In this appeal, Hrasky does not challenge any ruling by the district court. Regarding the suppression issue, we conclude that this court’s prior decision is law of the case and that there is no basis for revisiting it. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.