Patricia Davis-Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se action alleging housing discrimination. After careful de novo review, see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co., 507 F.3d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), we modify the judgment to be without prejudice as to any state-law claim Davis-Jackson was asserting in her complaint, cf. Labickas v. Ark. State Univ., 78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (following dismissal of federal claims, district court may dismiss state-law claims without prejudice), and we affirm the judgment as modified, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellees’ pending motion is denied.