Chinese citizen Fen Hao Chen petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. 2 Having carefully reviewed the record, we deny the petition. See Khrystotodorov v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 775, 781 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review).

The record supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as she provided specific cogent reasons for disbelieving Chen’s asylum-application and hearing claims as to why he left China. See Cao v. Gonzales, 442 F.3d 657, 660-61 (8th Cir. 2006). We also agree with the IJ that, even if Chen’s testimony were credible, he did not qualify for asylum, see Yang v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 494 F.3d 1311, 1318-19 (11th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2466, 171 L.Ed.2d 228 (2008) (per curiam); and he thus did not meet the higher standard required for withholding of removal, see Uli v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 950, 958 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny Chen’s petition for review.