Allison Chapman appeals the district court’s 1 denial of her motion for reconsideration. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, because Chapman raised arguments that she could have raised in a timely appeal. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169-70 (8th Cir. 1988) (standard of review; court was not required to grant Rule 60(b) motion where it raised ground for relief that could have been raised in timely appeal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.