Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Simbara Hydara v. Michael B. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Simbara Hydara v. Michael B. Mukasey, 324 F. App'x 534 (8th Cir. 2009)
Benton, Per Curiam, Riley, Smith

Simbara Hydara v. Michael B. Mukasey

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Simbara Hydara appeals from the district court’s 2 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo review, see Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 2004), we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper for the reasons expressed by the district court, see Lema v. INS, 341 F.3d 853, 854-57 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S. Mayer-on, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Reference

Full Case Name
Simbara HYDARA, Appellant, v. John DOE, Commissioner of the United States Department of Homeland Security; John Doe, Commissioner of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Appellees
Status
Unpublished
↑