Danny McCarthy v. Dr. Neil Mullins
Danny McCarthy v. Dr. Neil Mullins
Opinion
Former inmate Danny T. McCarthy appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted de novo review of the relevant parts of the record, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.) (summary judgment standard of review), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008); Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir. 2004) (claims not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned), we find no basis for reversal. 2 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
. It appears from McCarthy’s brief seeking an award of damages that he incorrectly believes the district court ruled in his favor on the claims he addresses on appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.