Matthew Sawyer appeals from the twenty-four month sentence imposed by the district court 1 following Sawyer’s violation *39 of the conditions of his supervised release. Sawyer argues that resentencing is required because the district court did not adequately consider the relevant factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a). Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the sentence imposed is reasonable and that the district court adequately explained its reasons for imposing it. See, e.g., United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir. 2008); United States v. Bear Robe, 521 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. 2008); United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 2008).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.