Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Randy Teinert v. Rachel Paulos

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Randy Teinert v. Rachel Paulos, 331 F. App'x 427 (8th Cir. 2009)
Per Curiam, Riley, Smith, Wollman

Randy Teinert v. Rachel Paulos

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s 1 order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Reference

Full Case Name
Randy Craig TEINERT, Appellant, v. Rachel K. PAULOS, Appellee
Status
Unpublished
↑