Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s 1 order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.