Rosie Hopkins appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action. ' After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to Hopkins, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8fch Cir- R- 47B- Hopkins’s motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied.