Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare, 334 F. App'x 787 (8th Cir. 2009)
Per Curiam, Riley, Smith, Wollman

Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Hoskins-Harris (Hoskins-Har-ris) appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to Hos-kins-Harris, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Thus, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jean C.. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Reference

Full Case Name
Pamela HOSKINS-HARRIS, Appellant, v. TYCO/MALLINCKRODT HEALTHCARE; United Auto Workers, Local 1887, Appellees
Status
Unpublished