U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2009

Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare

Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2009 · Per Curiam, Riley, Smith, Wollman
334 F. App'x 787

Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Hoskins-Harris (Hoskins-Har-ris) appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to Hos-kins-Harris, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Thus, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jean C.. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.