David Johnson appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV, Inc., 421 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759, 775 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.