Roger J. Day, M.D., appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his claims against Minnesota, the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, and its members, arising out of them decision not to grant him an unrestricted medical license. Following careful review, we agree with district court that Day’s discrimination and due process claims are barred by res judicata, see St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Compaq Computer Corp., 539 F.3d 809, 821 (8th Cir. 2008) (law of forum that rendered first judgment controls res judicata analysis; Minnesota courts review application of res judicata de novo; setting forth res judicata criteria under Minnesota law), and we find no basis for reversal. 2 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Day’s pending motion for oral argument is denied.