David Cazzell appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his employment-discrimination action. Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Cazzell failed to state a claim. Further, the court’s denial of Cazzell’s various motions does not provide a basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.