Wendell O’Neal appeals the adverse judgment entered in this action alleging civil rights and other violations stemming from O’Neal’s arrest and conviction for trespassing in August 2005, and his subsequent efforts to obtain records related to the incident. Following careful de novo review of the district court’s 1 judgment and O’Neal’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that O’Neal did not rebut defendants’ evidence demonstrating they were entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. O’Neal’s pending motions are denied.