Arkansas inmate David Daniels appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following an evidentiary hearing. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Daniels’s arguments, see Johnson v. Bi-State Justice Ctr., 12 F.3d 133, 135-37 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review; after evidentiary hearing, dismissal is proper if evidence does not present sufficient disagreement to require submission to jury but is so one-sided that one party must prevail as matter of law), we find no basis for reversal, see Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535-40, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) (standard applicable to conditions-of-confinement claims by pretrial detainees).

*101 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.