Arkansas inmate Larry Wayne Jones appeals the District Court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the record, we agree with the District Court that there were no trialworthy issues on Jones’s deliberate-indifference claims based on alleged delays in scheduling him for visits in the chronic-care clinic and in refilling his prescription *78 medications. 2 See Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008); see also Laughlin v. Schriro, 430 F.3d 927, 929 (8th Cir. 2005) (noting that when an inmate bases his Eighth Amendment claim on delays in medical treatment, he must offer verifying medical evidence establishing the detrimental effect of those delays), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 927, 127 S.Ct. 297, 166 L.Ed.2d 225 (2006); Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (observing that the burden on a party resisting summary judgment is to designate specific facts creating a trialworthy controversy). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.