Shelby J. Norris appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Medhaug v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 805, 813 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), we agree with the district court *676 that the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) findings concerning Norris’s mental residual functional capacity (RFC) were supported by substantial evidence, see Moore v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 520, 523 (8th Cir. 2009) (in determining RFC, ALJ must consider all relevant evidence, including medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and claimant’s own description of her limitations); see also Wagner v. Astrue, 499 F.3d 842, 848 (8th Cir. 2007) (it is ALJ’s function to resolve conflicts among opinions of various examining and treating physicians). Norris’s other arguments for reversal merit no discussion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.