Barbara Woolery appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her employment-discrimination action. After de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we find no error in the district court’s order, see Anda v. Wickes Furniture Co., 517 F.3d 526, 531-32 (8th Cir. 2008) (elements of hostile-work-environment claim); Martin v. Local 1513 & Dist. 118 of the Int’l Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 859 F.2d 581, 585 (8th Cir. 1988) (elements of retaliation claim). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.