Gloria Quiñones 1 appeals the district court’s 2 dismissal of her Title VII action claiming employment discrimination. After careful de novo review, see Coons v. Mineta, 410 F.3d 1036, 1039 (8th Cir. 2005); we agree with the district court that the record conclusively shows Quiñones failed to exhaust her administrative remedies because she did not timely file her formal discrimination complaint, see McAdams v. Reno, 64 F.3d 1137, 1141 (8th Cir. 1995) (exhaustion requirement). Further, Qui-ñones has failed to show that exceptional circumstances beyond her control contributed to the untimely filing for purposes of equitable tolling. See T.L. ex rel. Ingram v. United States, 443 F.3d 956, 963 (8th Cir. 2006) (discussing equitable tolling).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.