Pamela Rhodes appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against Arkansas State University. After careful de novo review, see Hannoon v. Fawn Eng’g Corp., 324 F.3d 1041, 1045 (8th Cir. 2003), we find no error in the district court’s order, see id. at 1048 (elements of harassment claim); Box v. Principi, 442 F.3d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 2006) (elements of race-discrimination and retaliation claims). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellee’s pending motion as moot.