Missouri inmate Pete Wright appeals the district court’s 1 partial dismissal and partial adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action alleging federal civil rights and state law tort claims. Following careful de novo review, we find that dismissal and summary judgment were appropriate for the reasons discussed in the district court’s orders. See Wojewski v. Rapid City Reg’l Hosp., 450 F.3d 338, 342 (8th Cir. 2006) (de novo review of order granting summary judgment); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Wright’s pending motion.