Kenny Halfacre appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil rights action. After carefully reviewing the record de novo, see Johnson v. Hamilton, 452 F.3d 967, 971 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that summary judgment was appropriate because there was no evidence that defendants violated Halfacre’s due process or equal protection rights, or retaliated against him. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.