Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Rudolph George Stanko v. Warden M. Cruz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Rudolph George Stanko v. Warden M. Cruz, 360 F. App'x 725 (8th Cir. 2010)
Bye, Per Curiam, Riley, Shepherd

Rudolph George Stanko v. Warden M. Cruz

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Rudolph George Stanko appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Upon de novo review, see Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam), we conclude that habeas relief was properly denied. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rudolph George STANKO, Appellant, v. Warden M. CRUZ, Local Director/Warden; Michael K. Nalley, Regional Director; Harley Lappin, Director, Appellees
Status
Unpublished
↑