U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2010

Rudolph Stanko, etc. v. Ricardo Rios, etc.

Rudolph Stanko, etc. v. Ricardo Rios, etc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2010 · Melloy, Bowman, Smith
366 F. App'x 725

Counsel

Rudolph George Stanko, White Deer, PA, pro se., Tricia Annette Tingle, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellees.

Rudolph Stanko, etc. v. Ricardo Rios, etc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Rudolph George Stanko appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Having reviewed the record de novo, see Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders, 590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir. 2010), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.