Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Charles Ashford v. Ray Hobbs

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Charles Ashford v. Ray Hobbs, 363 F. App'x 423 (8th Cir. 2010)
Wollman, Colloton, Gruender

Charles Ashford v. Ray Hobbs

Opinion

*424 PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Charles Ashford appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) and Ray Hobbs. 2 Upon de novo review, see Saunders v. Fanners Ins. Exch., 537 F.3d 961, 963 (8th Cir. 2008), we find no basis for reversal and accordingly affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United Stales District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

. The caption lists Hobbs as "Chief Director” of the ADC, apparently because that is what Ashford called Hobbs in his complaint. In its brief on appeal, the ADC refers to Hobbs as the "Deputy Director.” The discrepancy about Hobbs's job title makes no difference to our analysis, so we need not resolve it.

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles ASHFORD, Appellant, v. Ray HOBBS, Chief Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellees
Status
Unpublished
↑