[UNPUBLISHED]

Tommy and Carolyn Robinson appeal the district court’s 1 affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s 2 order restraining them from pursuing certain claims and defenses in state court, on the ground that those claims and defenses are property of their bankruptcy estates. After carefully reviewing the record, see In re Reynolds, 425 F.3d 526, 531 (8th Cir. 2005) (like district court, appellate court reviews bankruptcy court’s fact findings for clear error and conclusions of law de novo), we conclude that the bankruptcy court’s order is enforceable for the reasons discussed by the district court, see 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (bankruptcy court may issue any order necessary or appropriate to carry out provisions of title). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.