[UNPUBLISHED]

Federal inmate Milo Whitetail appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion to vacate a garnishment order. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err or abuse its discretion by finding that Whitetail was properly served with the application for writ of garnishment, the writ of garnishment, and a notice of garnishment and instructions to debtor; or by determining that tribal disbursements are not exempt property. See 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a),(f); 28 U.S.C. § 3202(b),(c); 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(3); Jones v. Swanson, 512 F.3d 1045, 1048 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of re *996 view). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.