Rev. David L. Joe v. Walgreens Co./ILL

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit February 18, 2011

Rev. David L. Joe v. Walgreens Co./ILL, 413 F. App'x 928 (8th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Reverend David Joe appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action asserting both state-law and federal law employment-discrimination claims. On de novo review, we conclude that dismissal of Joe’s state-law claims was proper. See Jansen v. Lemmon Fed. Credit Union, 562 N.W.2d 122, 124 (S.D. 1997). We also agree with the district court that Joe’s federal claims are time-barred, and conclude that the facts of this case do not warrant equitable tolling. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l); 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Reference

Full Case Name: Rev. David L. JOE, Appellant, v. WALGREENS CO./ILL; Walgreens Co./ ILL, District 311; Jason Frederick, in His Official Capacity; Mary Ann Hansen, in Her Official Capacity; Kristine Rasby, in Her Official Capacity; Frank Maxwell, in His Official Capacity, Appellees
Status: Unpublished