U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2011

Karen M. Seaworth v. William F. Messerli

Karen M. Seaworth v. William F. Messerli
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided March 15, 2011

Karen M. Seaworth v. William F. Messerli

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 10-3532/10-3533 ___________ Karen M. Seaworth, * * Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota.

William F. Messerli; Ross * Kramer; Jaime J. Hommerding, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees, * * ___________ No. 10-3534 ___________ Karen M. Seaworth, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Messerli & Kramer, P.A.; Ross * Kramer; Amanda E. Prtuzman, * * Appellees, * * ___________ No. 10-3535 ___________ Karen M. Seaworth, * * Appellant, * * v. * * William F. Messerli; Ross * Kramer; Amanda E. Prutzman, * * Appellees, * ___________ Submitted: March 7, 2011 Filed: March 15, 2011 ___________ Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Karen M. Seaworth appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her four separate but related Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuits. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Seaworth’s arguments for reversal, see Volden v. Innovative Fin. Sys., Inc., 440 F.3d 947, 950 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review), we find no basis for overturning the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.