David Stebbins appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for reconsideration of the magistrate’s 2 order staying his action pending a ruling in another case. We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider Stebbins’s appeal, because the district court’s order is not a final decision, and has not effectively ended the litigation. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of district courts); Boushel v. Toro Co., 985 F.2d 406, 408 (8th Cir. 1993) (typically grants of stays are not final decisions for purposes of § 1291; only time order granting stay will be considered final order is if it is tantamount to dismissal and effectively ends litigation); see also Huggins v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 566 F.3d 771, 773, 775 (8th Cir. 2009) (dismissing appeal sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.