Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105, 419 F. App'x 700 (8th Cir. 2011)

Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Rea appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his disability-discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. The undisputed evidence showed neither an adverse employment action, see Fenney v. Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Co., 327 F.3d 707, 711-12 (8th Cir. 2003) (elements for prima facie case of failure-to-accommodate claim under Amer *701 icans with Disabilities Act), nor retaliation, see Littleton v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLC, 568 F.3d 641, 644 (8th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Thomas REA, Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORE 1105, Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished