Timothy J. Boe appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his Truth in Lending Act lawsuit. Upon de novo review, see Detroit Gen. Ret. Sys. v. Medtronic, Inc., 621 F.3d 800, 804-05 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), we find that the dismissal was proper, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (pro se complaint must be liberally construed, but must allege sufficient facts to support claims advanced). We decline to consider the claims Boe has waived on appeal, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir. 2004), or the issues raised in the district court’s order which he has not briefed, see Meyers v. Starke, 420 F.3d 738, 743 (8th Cir. 2005); and we find nothing in the record reflecting judicial bias. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.