Yupei Wang appeals an order of the District Court 1 dismissing her employment-discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Strand v. Diversified Collection Serv., Inc., 380 F.3d 316, 317 (8th Cir. 2004), we affirm. Wang’s choice-of-law arguments fail because she did not raise them before the District Court, see St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Compaq Computer Corp., 539 F.3d 809, 824 (8th Cir. 2008), and we agree with the District Court that the Arkansas Civil Rights Act does not provide a cause of action for perceived disabilities, see Faulkner v. Ark. Children’s Hosp., 347 Ark. 941, 69 S.W.3d 393, 402 (2002).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.